After completing this training module, you should
have developed a good understanding of the general objectives of
the UNFCCC review process. You should also now be familiar with
the cross-cutting elements of the IPCC Good Practice Guidance and
how to utilize them in performing your reviews. Overall, we hope
that you have a good overall feeling for how the inventory review
process works and how you can effectively participate in it as a
member of an expert review team.
So at the risk of being repetitive once more, below is a summary
of the 12 most important points you should remember from this training
module:
1. One of the objectives of UNFCCC review process is that review
be conducted consistently across Parties. Given the differences
in the three review processes (In-Country, Centralized, and Desk),
you should avoid any biases in your assessments of each Party’s
inventory submission.
2. Again, you should ask yourself at each step of your review work
how each Party is performing on the four fundamentals: Methods,
Data, National inventory process (institutional arrangements/system)
and Transparency (documentation).
3. Also ask yourself, “Is this Party building a system to
produce a high quality national inventory submission?” Parties
should be making efforts to improve the quality of their national
inventories, especially in regards to data quality. Good data are
extremely important (as or more important than what method is used).
In keeping with your team’s prioritization scheme to finish
your reviews in the time allotted, you should probe for the characteristics
of each Party’s data, including its collection methods, caveats,
etc., in an effort to determine the quality and proper application
of the data.
4. And like we have said: Despite the best technical efforts
by the Party, it has failed if it did not provide a well documented
inventory submission.
|