| VI. SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS Each of the review approaches employed in
the UNFCCC review process has special implications for how you will
conduct your work as an expert.
In-Country Review Considerations
As you have probably discerned, the in-country review approach is
the most intensive because it focuses an entire expert review team
on a single Party’s submission. It also has the benefit of
interacting for a full week with the Party’s inventory experts
and access to references and documents that are not generally available
to desk or centralized expert review teams. The characteristics
of the in-country approach allow your team to focus on particular
areas; therefore during an in-country review you should:
· Give extra focus to investigate the Party’s
inventory process (system), including institutional arrangements
· Examine the Party’s documentation and archiving
procedures
· Request and examine actual references for original
data used in preparing estimates
· Give more attention to data collection systems and
what changes may have occurred to improve or worsen data quality
· Question staff working on specific source or sink
categories as to their knowledge of the Party’s QA/QC plan
and how they have implemented it in their work
Desk and Centralized Review Considerations
High quality documentation is critical for all inventory submissions,
but it is even more important for desk and centralized reviews.
The ability of your review team to complete the review process is
dependent upon Parties providing transparent documentation in their
inventory submissions. Therefore, during desk and centralized reviews
you and your team should give extra attention to the quality of
the documentation submitted by the Party.
Before you join your team members for a centralized review, you
should spend extra time preparing it. This extra preparation is
important so that the week you have to work directly with your team
can be used most effectively. Spending much of that week familiarizing
yourself with the relevant review materials squanders this brief
period you have to interact with the rest of your team.
Each of the review approaches employed in the UNFCCC review process
has special implications for how you will conduct your work as an
expert.
|