3. Does Luxemburg’s National Inventory Report (NIR) document the emission factors used to estimate CH₄ emissions from enteric fermentation and manure management?
1. Luxemburg’s submission is not transparent enough because country-specific emission factors are not explained clearly, although they are referenced.
2. Luxemburg’s submission is not transparent at all because no reference to country-specific emission factors is included in the NIR.
3. Luxemburg’s submission provides transparent information on its country-specific emission factors.
4. None of the above.

4. When a single livestock characterization is performed, the IPCC Good Practice Guidance defines that the Party must report supporting information in their NIR.

After reviewing the NIRs of Greece, New Zealand, and Slovakia, which Parties provided a thorough discussion of their single livestock characterization?

1. All three Parties
2. New Zealand
3. Greece and Slovakia
4. New Zealand and Slovakia
5. None of the three Parties